Self-limiting beliefs
If we have beliefs that are untrue, (and I believe we all do), they can hold us back for a lifetime. It's like having your foot on the brake of your progress. What do you think is true, that if you really looked at it, is not?
Dysfunctional parts of our economy
Yesterday we talked about two things that must be present to have a dynamic marketplace that puts out great products and services for us; we consumers. In doing so we get to live an ever greater standard of living for less work on our part, as enterprises get better and…
Is working harder the secret? (Answer)
Last week I asked this question and asked for your comments on the subject. Many of you did comment. I said I'd give my thoughts the next day, but I never did! So here goes. The best system for raising people up is one where people are free to pursue…
Where are you going? What's the next step?
What is your big goal? What is the next step - the one you should prioritize and take today?
Buying American – Patriotic?
I didn't realize there would be so much to say on this subject when I began writing. But sound bites that you can fit on a bumper sticker fuel ignorance. "Buy American - save our jobs". "Support the union and support jobs". Sounds ok. But it's not in our interest…
Buying American – Patriotic? Part 4
I drive a Chevy pickup truck. I think they make the best pick up trucks in the US. I am a bit ignorant because I have never driven many of the foreign brands, but I like my brand and it WORKS for me, so I stick with it. I drive…
Buying American – Patriotic? Part 3
If we say that we should buy American solely because we are American and we feel it is immoral or unjust to buy goods made elsewhere, then we are ignoring free-market capitalism - what works. When people trade with each other, they are looking for the best deal, the right…
Buying American – Patriotic? Part 2
Free trade and free-market capitalism, which was embraced by the United States before it was most other places (some places still don't have it and they suffer), has caused the standard of living to skyrocket and lifted billions of people out of poverty. This works. It always works. It never…
Is "Buy American" Patriotic?
Ok, I try not to raise too many feathers on Think Daily, but once in a while I take a chance. I do not want anyone to unsubscribe. Last week I threw it out there with great success with the Income Inequality ideas. Here we go again. I am an…
Self-limiting beliefs

If we have beliefs that are untrue, (and I believe we all do), they can hold us back for a lifetime.
It’s like having your foot on the brake of your progress.
What do you think is true, that if you really looked at it, is not?
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
What to do if you make a mistake.

1) Admit it quickly.
2) Apologize sincerely.
3) Fix it.
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Dysfunctional parts of our economy

Yesterday we talked about two things that must be present to have a dynamic marketplace that puts out great products and services for us; we consumers. In doing so we get to live an ever greater standard of living for less work on our part, as enterprises get better and better. Those two elements are COMPETITION among providers such as companies and workers, and DISCRETION among consumers.
Let’s clarify.
Competition – Company – “We have to do as well or better than the other company’s at serving people or providing our product, or we’re goners”. Workers – “I have to work hard and educate my self so I can be a person of value to a company who will pay me well for doing so. I must find a company that will recognize the value I bring and where I can be happy working. I am also free to start my own business if I think I can do it better.”
Discretion on the part of the consumer – “Do I need this (product or service)?” “Do I want it?” “Am I willing to pay the price they are asking?” “Do I have a choice?”
Now, let me ask YOU. Is there competition and discretion in these parts of the economy that many of us consider less than optimal in some places?
The Motor Vehicle Department. Is there competition? Discretion?
Public Schools? Is there discretion for all, or only those who can afford it? Is there true competition, or a monopoly?
A provider who’s workers are protected by a union, such a government agency. Remember John? He had to do well or he may get fired. Remember Mary? She could let John go if he misbehaved OR she could pay John more than other workers if he was a star.
Health care. If I have insurance and using health care is “FREE”, do I exercise much discretion? Does the price go up or down depending on how much I use it, or is it the same price so I don’t care?
I don’t want to get everyone excited here. I simply want to make a simple point – Competition and Discretion are vital to getting it right. If we have them, and people pursue their own self-interest knowing they are there, good things will happen. If we have a system that protects providers (company’s, agencies, workers) from competition, they lose their incentive to do well. If we have a system where consumers lose their discretion, such as no-cost, no choice, then they lose their ability to make things better with their choices.
Please comment (intelligently).
Freedom of choice is essential!
If we are not willing to get better then we have not earned the opportunity to receive the reward. Free market reveals & rewards excellence & reveals & subtracts from complacency.
Larry, I love your insight into things and I feel very strongly the same way on so many levels. People think that more and more government is good, but is our government a good fiscal example? Most operate in the red. What about unions aren’t they great for wages and benefits? Yes and being non productive for a higher price? Don’t get me wrong there are good and needed programs that we have access to but the more we can get people to want to do better, to have goals and ambitions, to strive to achieve, the better we as a nation will be. We live in the greatest country in the world with the most opportunity for changing the narrative in one generation or less. WOW! Thanks for all you have done for me and my family and my families family!
Agreed. I think people want the government “cushion” due to fear that a program , like the postal service, will disappear if run improperly. ” What will I do if the ability to mail something just stops some day” they might think.
To me it sounds like an opportunity.
Makes perfect sense. Thanks for breaking down a good thought!
Nicely done. That was well said.
You are right on. This is what our county was founded on. Fair and open Competition is what drives innovation and improvement
As the nature of economics changes, so does the functionality of Adam Smith’s invisible hand. As the cost of living continues to approach zero, supply and demand become less functional. to illustrate my point look at the iPhone. Millions of dollars of functionality for a few hundred dollars. its why the government is getting away with printing money without runaway inflation. it is being offset with the deflative pressures of technological improvements.
Your example of healthcare is interesting. Americans who want to cling to a supply/demand model pay many more times for comparatively substandard healthcare, than other industrialized nations. As time goes on supply and demand will be less forceful. What will? Hard to say. It will be interesting to see.
Thanks for the shout out Larry, It made my day!
Love your line of reasoning! For the reasons you described I believe as many government services as possible should be privatized. People should have a choice as to how they spend their money and who with. So many government agencies are very inefficiently run because they have no incentive to run any better. Thanks again for taking the time to write these thoughtful posts every day!
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Is working harder the secret? (Answer)

Last week I asked this question and asked for your comments on the subject. Many of you did comment. I said I’d give my thoughts the next day, but I never did! So here goes.
The best system for raising people up is one where people are free to pursue their own self-interest within a system of laws. Consumers are in charge. That means you. You are in charge of you. You make decisions based on what you think is best for you, both as a consumer, and as a supplier.
So if Mary has a company, and John works his tail off for Mary, should John get paid more than Mary because he works harder than she does, even though she is the owner of the company?
There are three stories at work in this question. Mary’s, John’s and the company’s customers.
Mary is trying to win over and please customers. She knows that if her company serves their interest well, they will come back and refer others. Mary wants to be successful herself, so she knows that to do so, she has to make her customers (successful) happy. Mary hired John to do work that customers value. If John is doing work customers love, Mary will value John and pay him more. If Mary does not pay John fairly, she knows she may lose him to another company because she has COMPETITION. It’s a free market and Mary has to compete for both customers and employees. If she cannot mix labor, materials and outside services together to produce a result customers want at a price they like, then the enterprise will perish. Competition for customers and employees keeps Mary honest.
Now for John’s story. John is a hard worker. He has decided to work for Mary’s company. He may feel if Mary notices his work he will get a raise or promoted – so it is in John’s interest to work hard. John knows if he does not work hard or messes up, that Mary can let him go. The labor market is a COMPETITION. If John doesn’t value his job, he knows that Mary can get someone else. This keeps John honest.
What the job pays is based on whether there are others who can do the job for a given pay. It doesn’t make sense for Mary to pay John far more to do a job that someone else will do for less. Afterall, she has to keep cost down so she can keep prices down. If she doesn’t, then one of her competitors will and she will lose customers. If she loses enough customers, she loses her business. Mary is willing to pay the most money to people who get the most results that her customers are looking for, and for people who can take responsibility and solve problems.
If John feels mistreated by Mary due to low pay, bad working conditions or any reason, he can go find another job. It’s an open market – there is COMPETITION.
Now for the consumer. The Consumer doesn’t care about John or Mary. The consumer only cares about what is in it for them and at what price. If the consumer loves what (the company) John does for them, then they may be willing to pay more, come back, etc.
This is the answer. People pursuing their own self-interest in an open market where there is COMPETITION on the part of company’s and workers and DISCRETION on the part of the consumer.
COMPETITION AND DISCRETION – the magic formula.
This had lead me to tomorrow’s post where I will ask you about dysfunctional parts of the economy and ask what is wrong.
I agree with paragraphs 2,3, and 4.
I disagree with paragraph 1. We the employees should not be worried about pleasing our customers rather bringing in leads converting them to buying your product or service because they can’t live without your product and the value the product or service gives them which in turn builds trust with the company and loyalty to both thus keeping customer satisfied which brings referrals to business and increased revenue and profitability to company and to the number of closing the deals the sales person brought in determines whether or not YOU are a valuable employee that deserves a raise right? Tie salary based on goal results makes employee work harder to make it. Just because we value someone that we will pay them more. I disagree here too we can value people and if they don’t produce the results we are aiming for and fall short of their goal then they don’t get a merit raise just cost of living raise right?
You spoke about what keeps Mary and John honest, but what about the honesty of the customer? The insurance industry sales products that are often abused by customers in the form of litigation, costing the industry billions of dollars per year. How does Mary or John keep themselves honest in the wake of this type of consumer activity?
Atlas shrugged, great principles described in this book!
There is also competition between individual employees that results in increased productivity and customer satisfaction. I always try to reward those who are most efficient, courteous, and work as part of the team. Fulfilling the customers expectations is the key to referrals and repeat business. We don’t try to burn any bridges!
We use a regular daily, weekly, monthly priority management system here at Spectrum — there are daily and weekly themes to meet bigger goals. Last week’s theme was:
“The Clients do not care about OUR problems”, i.e., “the consumer doesn’t care about John or Mary”.
This doesn’t mean we don’t build relationships, it just means the conversation needs to be about the client and the value of the deliverable — which is being paid for at a premium to be seamless.
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Where are you going? What's the next step?

What is your big goal?
What is the next step – the one you should prioritize and take today?
You’ve taught me over the years there’s nothing better than preparation and perseverance – good luck on this next new race Larry!
Larry, I live just over the hill from the Vegas to Reno finish line. I will be at the finish line and will see you there! If you get a chance while you are at the northern end of Nevada, be sure to go to Virginia City, home of the Virginia City Grand Prix. Virginia City is the largest historical landmark in the US, with great history as a silver mining town. The VCGP starts on main street in town and then heads out into the surrounding hills.
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Buying American – Patriotic?

I didn’t realize there would be so much to say on this subject when I began writing. But sound bites that you can fit on a bumper sticker fuel ignorance. “Buy American – save our jobs”. “Support the union and support jobs”. Sounds ok. But it’s not in our interest to support America or a union IF it doesn’t work well or produce what we would choose if we had a choice. Consumers must rule in free markets.
There’s an idea that if we lose manufacturing jobs we lose it all. But is that true? Yes, manufacturing jobs have been declining for decades. But consider this – we make more than ever -the production of goods in America is up, it’s just that we need fewer people to do it because we have become better at it. Machines and automation have replaced more jobs than China. Are they the enemy?
If either were an enemy, why then was unemployment the lowest in decades (just before the government forced so many out of work this spring)? The answer is that things are changing. There are far more service jobs, distribution jobs, high tech jobs, and other kinds of jobs. We have plenty of jobs. Manufacturing does not equal jobs as a whole. If you were a manufacturer and did not change, you are toast. But when you were born they did not stamp your forehead “thou shalt be a manufacturer the rest of your life”. Change. People can change.
And these days, who wants the manufacturing jobs of yesteryear? Doing repetitive work all day standing by a workbench or loud machine, day in and day out? Do you?
Yes, we should make sure other countries are fair to us. We don’t want them ripping off our patents or cheating, but selling something cheaper is not cheating – it’s what consumers want.
I live in a house that is made in America. My HVAC guy gives me service made in America. My grocery store sells me food largely made in America. My bank has tellers that give me service made in America. My mechanic, my lawn guy, my gas station attendant, my dry cleaners, and all the restaurants I go to give me services made in America. The goods my businesses make and sell are mostly made in America. The truckers and accountants and lawyers and roofers and the gas company and hundreds if not thousands of Americans give me products and services, made in America. Some distribute and service goods made in other countries. And in my Chevy pickup truck, there are foreign parts. Heck, it may have been assembled in Mexico.
We have come a long way, and we have all benefitted. America has adapted. Americans live far better today and have far more choices than they did in 1964 when I was born or in 1982 when I graduated high school.
To say we must buy American because it’s American, or not buy something made elsewhere because it is made elsewhere, is ignorant, and goes against what works. People that say this have houses filled with foreign goods when they may not know it or want to admit it.
Buy what you think is best. Let’s have an open marketplace so we have a choice. Let’s protect competition with anyone.
The most patriotic thing you can do is to contribute to a highly competitive organization. Be a high-value provider to others, likely through a company with others you collaborate with to produce an excellent product or service that others love and want. Don’t ask to be protected – compete.
That’s very American and very patriotic.
Your points are proven by the auto industry in the 80’s and 90’s when the Japanese cars were miles ahead of us in quality and sales were showing it. Then American car builders stepped it up to compete with them and it worked because we get a better product for a competitive price.
Competition is the backbone of a competitive marketplace. Couple that with the “invisible hand” and it is a fascinating model.
I have read all of the Buying American posts. I understand what you are saying and even agree with it. However, you have not so far said anything about products that are made in sweat shops with non existent labor laws using women and children who are basically slaves. While we are enjoying our freedoms and living our better than ever lives here in America, we need to make sure we are not doing it on the backs of slaves and children that will never know anything at all about having even their basic needs met. Buy foreign made products. Use all the American made things that have parts that were manufactured in other countries. Promote free trade and the idea of competition so that we have choices. Do it all day long. But remember that a person made those things. Let’s not forget the human equation in this discussion. I am not sure I want to be considered patriotic if it means that I ignore humanity.
Some of us are producers, but every last one of us is a consumer. When consumers win with free trade, we all win.
Competition is king. The medical field is a good indicator of that. When the insurance companies took over deciding who would get paid to care for you competition went out the window. The best thing that would happen would be to get rid of insurance – completely. Therefore you only pay for a service when you need it. And choose who is the best practitioner to spend your money with.
Thank you Larry, for the very simple and excellent lesson on free market capitalism!! It needs to be told to more people through more outlets.
Great article!
100% agree with your post. I have four sons ages 30-35. They were made in America. None of them want factory jobs but they do want lower prices. We all do. Furthermore, I’m a wholesaler of plumbing supplies and I sell to plumbers. Some very large and other very small. The larger players buy cheap and have most of the bargaining power. Several suppliers fight and lower pricing, extend terms etc…. just to get the large players business. My point is, America holds the power here when we are the largest player in the market. Let’s use our buying power to buy better and stop these nonsensical trade wars. We are only taxing ourselves. No disrespect to those who feel differently but my suggestion would be to sign up for an economics course to gain a better understanding of free markets and how important it is to the US economy. More markets equal more competition and more competition is good for the consumer.
Amen Larry,
I agree with everything you have said!
Don’t forget to talk about the so called trade deficit. If we send money to another country to get goods that is not a deficit that is a win win.
Just like Americans do every day every time they buy something.
Keep up the great work and I hope to be able to ride off road motorcycles with you someday!
Tim Slamans
Well said Larry!
Buy American Smart!
I agree with Larry and Nancy. Buy American but at what cost…..Supporting the unions?
Buy Chinese but at what cost….Supporting genocide?
I do my research and vote with my dollars.
I am a maintenance supervisor at a manufacturing company in Shelton CT, we make parts for all kinds of companies especially automotive. The machines are loud and the work is repetitive and we have machine operators that have been there for forty years or more, is that any worse than crawling into a crawl space or attic day in and day out? Not everyone is going to college. There have been a lot of american companies that just sold out. I am all for competition, but how do you deal with a country like China when the only good idea they came up with was to steal everyone else`s idea`s and become a super power.
Loved this, my friends and I fight about this all the time…especially about cars. I’m a dodge man myself 😉
I have read and reread your recent blog posts regarding capitalism, the advantages of free markets, and the problems with slogans like buy American, etc. You have some legitimate points but like the slogans you rightly suggest over simplify an issue your analysis of why free market capitalism is a better system makes much the same mistake just in a lot more words. For one thing the free market capitalism you describe does not exist for the most part except in theory and for another our loyalty to an ideal or principle is of equal or greater importance than the one sided view you have articulated in your posts. To illustrate the point I will share a personal life altering story with you:
In 2003 I was working for a professional liability insurance company that had been acquired by General Electric a few year earlier. Also in that year the US and allies invaded Iraq and my son was among the first to be sent off to war in what would become the longest year of my life living in constant fear that someone in dress uniform would knock on our door to report his death. (in fact his best friend was killed by a suicide bomber that year). Shortly after his deployment I was asked to attend a presentation in Overland Park, Kansas at out parent company, ERC (Employers Reinsurance Corporation) to listen to Jack Welch, Chairman/CEO of GE expound on his views of business. I was dumbfounded to listen to his opinions that loyalty was dead, employees should be prepared to be terminated at any time (always be in fear of losing your job), the only thing that really mattered was getting the numbers and if your company or division couldn’t produce a net in excess of 28% be prepared to be sold or liquidated. In short the only thing that mattered were the numbers. I thought about those remarks for a long time particularly in the context that my son’s life depended on reciprocal loyalty to his country and to his unit and it was his willingness and those around him to adhere to that code that made it possible for Mr. Welch to have the freedom to express his opinions and pursue GE’s corporate goals.. That presentation altered my life because much to the dismay of my superiors I resigned three months later after 18 years and went into business for myself. I was offered more money, a promotion all to no avail as I explained I would not work for anyone whose view of the world was constrained to “getting the numbers”, whatever the cost.
So how did GE’s pursuit of getting the numbers work out. Well, “free market capitalism” didn’t exist for GE, one of the most criminally and civilly fined companies in the US in 2003. The way GE and many companies work is by stifling competition, bribing officials, buying out competitors and shutting them down, and by controlling expenses the biggest of which (for most companies) is labor. In an ideal “free market” world all companies would compete on a level playing field, with workers in a particular industry given similar wages and benefits. But that’s not the way it works. In fact you could probably say slavery is the ultimate expression of capitalism – nothing better than free labor. So why do you think we have had to pass so many laws to protect workers? That comes at a cost so if labor costs are a problem and you can’t get around that through mechanization then you either find a way to cheat or move offshore, where the laws are less restrictive, which brings me back to GE and its move to send work to China and India. {And by the way these weren’t just manufacturing jobs, it was service and clerical jobs as well, I know because I was there when the “process mappers” from India showed up to figure out how many clerical and service jobs could be “mapped” to Bangalore, India ). So what’s been the net result of this competition to reduce costs and deliver a cheaper product to the consumer? Well in the case of China we are certainly waking up to Jack’s and many other CEO’s mistake – the largest transfer of wealth and technology (the FBI’s characterization not mine) in world history.
What’s my point? What was the cost? To quote you:
“We have come a long way, and we have all benefitted. America has adapted. Americans live far better today and have far more choices than they did in 1964 when I was born or in 1982 when I graduated high school”
It might interest you to know that in 1985 the US became the world’’s largest debtor nation, thanks to decisions by Jack Welch, other likeminded CEOs and our elected representatives – a debt my children and grandchildren will bear as a burden in the form of higher interest rates and taxation. Was my son’s loyalty misplaced? Is that how “we have all benefited? Jack had no loyalty to anything other than shareholder value. It’s equally disturbing that in 1964 we produced almost all our own clothes, pharmaceuticals, etc. and now we find ourselves vulnerable to foreign interests in many vital areas. Is that how “we have all benefited”? The outcome for GE as a direct result of Jack’s and his hand picked and trained successor Jeff Immelt’s policies is a company saddled with debt and worth about 10% of what it was valued at in 2000. My personal observation as to one reason why GE is in its current sorry state is that lack of loyalty – the thing that helped my son through his experience in Iraq. GE drove out all the people that cared about getting it right, getting it done, caring about the customer, making things, etc. and replaced them with people that did whatever it took to “get the numbers”. They drove out everybody else – the people that actually cared. Sure labor costs came down and the share price went up but the underlying motivation ignored what really made the company great and that was the loyalty of it’s employees to the company and its ideals. So when you say slogans like “Buy American” are “ignorant” I would urge you to check your prejudice and look at the issue a little deeper. First it is pure fantasy that free market capitalism exists in most parts of the world to any great degree when the driving forces of capitalism are maximizing gain by driving down costs. Likewise it a fantasy that loyalty to an ideal whether it be company or a country and its principles don’t matter. At the end of the day for most capitalists “greed is good” to quote a movie character, to which I would reply, yes but principles and loyalty matter.
(Note: You may be wondering why GE took an interest in insurance companies like the one I worked for, when they were noted for many other things. They didn’t care about delivering a quality service or product to insurance consumers in spite of all their promotional double talk. What they really were interested in was the large amount of cash reserves many of these companies held to pay future losses. In the insurance world companies are required by law to set aside a certain amount of money to cover future claims. This dollar amount is referred to as a loss reserve and represents liquid assets that can be converted to cash to pay claims. The first act of GE’s “process managers” was to have the reserve amounts on pending cases reduced so they could strip the excess cash for other purposes, acts that now are still being litigated and investigated.)
Signed:
Vic Bennett
Arizona Foundation Solutions
Vic,
If GE’s value is far less than what it was, this shows their behavior is not appreciated by people like you who left. Their competitors have done better. But, you are a beneficiary of capitalism as a consumer – you can’t not be. Just because Jack Welch had a given approach, doesn’t mean he represents all of the actors in the system. Personally, I am no GE fan, that is for sure. I appreciate your son’s service. Thank you.
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Buying American – Patriotic? Part 4

I drive a Chevy pickup truck. I think they make the best pick up trucks in the US. I am a bit ignorant because I have never driven many of the foreign brands, but I like my brand and it WORKS for me, so I stick with it.
I drive a Chevy Corvette. This car is the best sports car in the world for the money. It performs like a Ferrari or Lamborghini which costs 3 or 4 times the price. It’s cheap to fix and parts are readily available – though I never need any. Made in America. My choice.
I ride a Harley Davidson. I first owned a 1976 Sportster. It was junk. I got stuck on the side of the road so often, it leaked, wouldn’t start, handled like crap. I went around saying Harleys suck for many years, while I drove a Yamaha street bike. Then the company was sold and the new guys got their act together. Years later I drove my friends Harley on one of our annual riding trips. I was hooked. I bought that bike from him and still own it. It rides like a Cadillac and I don’t have any problems with it. America earned me back.
I ride a Japanese motocross bike and desert racing bike. They make the best and they are not made in America. I am going to switch to motocross bikes made in Austria this year and I will pay 20% more. Why? I think they are even better. My choice. America does not make dirt bikes. Just as they don’t make compressors or fans or coils for the dehumidifiers my company makes. ALL manufacturers of dehumidifiers get them and other parts from overseas. They could not be successful otherwise.
When an American citizen goes to WalMart and fills their cart of $150, they are making their lives better. And that would not be possible without foreign trade.
When there are free markets and free trade, we get to chose, and in so doing, we win; our lives get better.
More tomorrow…
Wouldn’t trade my GMC pickup for the world. 17 years still going strong only regular maintenance. (needs a little body work)
KTM…..nice. You will love it.
Made that switch from Yamaha 5 years ago. You won’t regret it, I bought two.
Thank you for posting those posts – they are invaluable in the basic understanding of the meaning of freedom in a social and business environments
Had a 71 Superglide was junk Have a 09 Ford 150 260,000 miles on only regular maintenance. I keep waiting for something to happen, but not yet.
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Buying American – Patriotic? Part 3

If we say that we should buy American solely because we are American and we feel it is immoral or unjust to buy goods made elsewhere, then we are ignoring free-market capitalism – what works. When people trade with each other, they are looking for the best deal, the right product at the right price. As consumers, if we ignore these criteria, we will wind up with something that is either not as good or more expensive. Is that what we want? Of course not.
Now if you are the producer of said goods that are overpriced or not as good, you may come up with all sorts of justifications and cry “it’s unfair” and “can’t you see what they are doing to our company and our industry?” But in a free market, the consumer is king – they have to be for progress to be made. We can not limit their choices and drive up their cost with tariffs. (Tariffs on goods from a particular country are a TAX ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE – because they are the ones who pay it.)
In a free market, we go shopping for what we want at the best price. Let’s say we wanted titanium. We can’t find any in the U.S., good thing Khazahstan has it, and we buy it from them because they have a resource we want.
Let’s say the resource we want is cheaper labor. Some countries have this. And make no mistake – they even have cheap skilled labor.
Let’s say we want (insert name of product or service here____) and it’s available at a better price from (insert name of country here_____). As a consumer, we have a choice. Buy it cheaper from a foreign supplier, or buy it from an American supplier at a higher price. It’s our choice. We can consider quality, availability, and many other factors, but it’s our choice. When we make that choice we are making it because we feel it is in our best interest. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the key of the most powerful force in economics – free-market capitalism.
We need free competition, sound money to trade with (that is worth the same tomorrow as it is today), and yes – rule of law. We can’t have people ripping us off or cheating us and getting away with it. We can’t have the government saying we have to buy this or that, from here or there. It distorts the market by the limited choice and encourages suppliers who DO NOT offer the best thing to get lazy and not get better, more efficient, or innovating their way to the top again.
America has lots of resources. But there are some things it does not have. Other countries have resources, and they lack certain things they need. The solution? Trade with each other. Like people North Carolina and California trade furniture and wine and iPhones, because it is in their interest to do so, we can trade with Vietnam, China, and Pakistan for the same reason – it makes our lives better AND makes the lives of the people in those countries better too.
It would be crazy to give countries aid, while at the same time limiting trade with them by any means – right?
Free voluntary trade makes our lives better.
More tomorrow…
I agree with most of this. the area I have an issue with is when we tell our manufacturer that they have to meet certain EPA, OSHA or other standards and then allow another country to send in goods that were made cheaper due to them polluting our planet and abusing their workforce. I’ve said many times that the earth is a dirtier place when we incentivize manufacturers to take operations overseas by stacking on excessive regulations here.
Nice job! This is so hard for people to understand. I remember when I was a kid, my father saying we should spend our money in our little town rather than the slightly bigger town 25 miles ago. Basic principles of economics can be counterintuitive.
While I agree with much of what you said there are some problems with the trade agreements we have been enjoying with certain countries. Namely with countries that don’t promote or allow the same standard of living as America, who allow slave (or barely paid) labor, who allow dirty manufacturing processes that we know are harmful to our health and who use our money to pad the pockets of their ultra-wealthy while allowing the rest of the people to live in abject poverty. That’s not a level playing field upon which we could ever hope to compete. There are countless people in America currently on welfare because they aren’t qualified to perform the only jobs that are left in America. If they were allowed to produce some of these “cheap” products that require little skill then they could be earning a living for themselves instead of living off the government. As long as we have this imbalance we need the tariffs to pay for the welfare for the people who are put out of work due to the inequality of foreign labor. One way this could be “fixed” is by eliminating the minimum wage and overtime pay requirements in America. I doubt that will ever happen though.
You post makes perfect sense. Thank you for your daily posts!
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Buying American – Patriotic? Part 2

Free trade and free-market capitalism, which was embraced by the United States before it was most other places (some places still don’t have it and they suffer), has caused the standard of living to skyrocket and lifted billions of people out of poverty. This works. It always works. It never not works. And places that have “controlled” or “closed” economies do not work, and the people have a far lower standard of living.
Remember our talk yesterday of observing “what works and what does not work” and holding it above our ill-conceived beliefs. As the United States grew and we made lots of stuff. We were first to make much of the stuff because we were the first to embrace capitalism.
Free market capitalism is where we all have the opportunity to serve others by making better mousetraps or giving better service. When we solve problems for other people, these customers are free to buy what we have, adding their money for it in a voluntary exchange, because they feel their life will be better. If they don’t like what we have or the price we ask, they won’t buy.
This forces the producers to get better to win more customers and beat our competition. If we don’t have competition and force others to buy our stuff through regulation, coercion, or by shutting down competition, then our consumers have poor choices in the marketplace.
Often, when people criticize capitalism, they are criticizing crony capitalism. That’s when the big established business or industries lobby the government for protection or favors or subsidies. If Detroit goes to Washington and says “slap tariffs on imports so we can charge higher prices” (instead of becoming better and more efficient), that is crony capitalism. If unions lobby and negotiate for higher wages and pensions, it ties the hands of the company or government, preventing them from firing poor performers, reducing incentives of workers to get better, and raises costs for the company or government. In this scenario, the parasite often kills the host – unless the parasite moves to a host that can just raise taxes, borrow huge sums, or print money – which may work for a while, but not forever. I digress.
When an industry lobbies for protection, such as requiring all participants to be licensed (i.e. hairdressers, nail salons, plumbers,) or requiring them to get permission from some board or commission or meet over stringent requirements, it’s often a blend of trying to make things better, with a healthy dose of protectionism – making it harder for new people or companies to come in and compete with them by creating a barrier to entry. It also creates the boards, inspectors, and agencies that exert power over the regulated, which is a recipe for favors and bad behavior and getting in the way of an entrepreneur that has a better idea.
Let’s be clear. Crony capitalism is not free-market capitalism. Instead, it’s the evil child.
More on the next post…
There is nothing wrong with digressing when it includes such important topics as the ongoing viability of our great nation. I know this isn’t the main point of your blog this morning, but the national debt, annual deficits and insatiable appetite for more free stuff is antithetical to capitalism. It is good to take care of others and help them, but to confiscate the wealth that is being created to such a degree as it is today is unsustainable – IMHO. I’d love to hear your thoughts on that.
“ Free market capitalism is where we all have the opportunity to serve others by making better mousetraps or giving better service.”
Should be replaced with:
“Free market capitalism is where we all have the opportunity to pursue our own values by creating values for others through free, voluntary exchange.”
Hi Larry! I am really loving this mini-series you are doing! Keep it up, I can’t wait to hear what’s next.
I don’t disagree. however lets give credit where credit is due. The Dutch invented Capitalism… we just took their ideas when they came here (Wall Street was originally a Dutch settlement) and made them better.
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Is "Buy American" Patriotic?

Ok, I try not to raise too many feathers on Think Daily, but once in a while I take a chance. I do not want anyone to unsubscribe. Last week I threw it out there with great success with the Income Inequality ideas. Here we go again.
I am an American. I was an Eagle Scout. I recited the Pledge of Allegiance growing up nearly every day. My parents were in fraternal organizations such as the Moose Club and the Elks Club, who revered America and the flag. I love my country (what the government has become – not so much). I love the land, the people, the diversity and the spirit. I mostly love freedom. It is my number one value.
When I was a young man, I knew nothing about economics, other countries, or the benefits of free trade. I only knew I was a GM guy; Chevy guy. It was easy for me to call out the “Buy American” rally cry. Wasn’t it supporting our own communities and saving American jobs? Seemed like it to me.
I was ignorant. We all say stupid things when we don’t know enough about a thing. I am sure I still do it, but I am far more careful now, and often reserve judgment, knowing I probably don’t know enough about a situation, and I don’t want to say something dumb that I will have to retract later. But, alas, we can never know everything about all we speak of, and we still say dumb things and support issues we are on the wrong side of.
We get conditioned. Our parents told us something, and talked about it in the house and at the dinner table. Our professors told us something too. These are older wiser people and they must be right? Aren’t they?
Our friends, especially if we hang out with people like ourselves, are ignorant too. And we pick up their positions and beliefs. This is how the human mind works.
Recall our earlier conversations. The brain is your hardware. It floats around in the darkness, waiting for input. The inputs, or software, come mostly from our cameras (eyes) and microphones (ears). The brain doesn’t care what comes in. It will process the conditioning of a low performing person or a high performing person with no preference. The information coming in becomes accepted and it cements into beliefs and expectations of how the world is based on repetition, and experiences real or imagined. Once a belief is set, the brain looks for validation in the world that it is right – and it always finds them because the ego does not want to be wrong.
The news is a place for validation and fear (their agenda, attempting to control us), which makes our positions even more rigid. This is how it works. This is how YOU work.
But if we are to progress and get smarter, we must stop seeking validation for positions our ignorant self established based on input from many others who are ignorant (ignorant means we don’t know something or don’t know much about it), and start looking for what works.
You can look for right or wrong based on your definition. But it’s far better to look for what works, and what doesn’t work.
So what does this have to do with the title of this post? More tomorrow…
Love these thoughts Larry. And agree, Tanner is great! Glad to be a strong neighbor business supporting this great country…God bless
Bravo and thanks for standing for American values!!!????
I too love Freedom. It seems to me that one’s thinking is largely influenced by what their “true north” is. I know what that is for me, and my thinking and conclusions are greatly influenced by how individual situations and circumstances are in relation to that frame of reference. That helps me chart the course on where I am heading to. I’m also a trained engineer and scientist and try to objectively look at the raw data. I prefer to draw my own conclusions from the data versus what someone else (likely with an agenda) would like me to infer from that same data – or partially a conveniently distilled subset of that data. Your comments on confirmation bias are also important to be aware of when thinking about issues and plans. Can’t wait to read your comments tomorrow!
Larry,
Well articulated. If only more people thought logically and didn’t jump emotionally, we might be able to have more discourse and solve more problems!!
Larry if not your Job to make people that follow you Think. Then who?
Since I was blessed to meet you in 2005 . You have never be soft. Your kind! But not soft. In high school did we learn anything from a easy teacher. Or was it the passionate teacher that wanted us to succeed. The one that held us to a different standard.
It’s easy for a 50 old to answer that. Might be tougher for a 20 something too. I believe being smart has little to do with being wise.
As you say it’s not a doing problem most people are afflicted with.
It’s a Thinking Problem. Thanks for making us think. I share many of your Think Dailey to my Entire Team.
Adam Smith… the Wealth of Nations….. do what you do best and trade for the rest.
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Join the over 20,000 people who receive Larry's Daily Inspiring Messages
Larry values privacy and will never sell your information.

Do all three
And by fix it make it so that it is difficult, if not impossible, to do again.
I am grateful for you too, Larry!
Last week I made a stupid and very insensitive comment about China that I regretted as soon as i posted it. It was unprofessional and lowered the standards of this blog, I am sorry.
Well said. This is very important.
That is how we grow to be better people.
And, don’t hold yourself captive in quilt.